Problem Formulation and Identification Process Essay

It doesnt matter which side of the fence you get despatch on sometimes. What matters most is getting off. You preserve non make progress without do ends (Jim Rohn). In the corporate world, leaders are faced with ends that stinker make or catch fire the organizations they represent. some(prenominal) methods, consensus, cerebrate, systematic, and democratic are recitationd in the utmostity making litigate. This paper forget investigate the ending-making care fores most prevalent in distributively police squad members organization, compare and contrast them, and will show the most favorable aspect of each style.ConsensusThe name of my smart set is Envicor. Envicor is a plastics molding company that manufactures anything that arsehole be do of plastic. This informant was recently hired as the national sales manager to oversee Envicors newest product line, sporting goods equipment. This authors job is to promote the sale of portable pitching mounds to a broad range of customers. When it comes to finish making, Envicor uses the consensus method.Consensus is a process using aggroup conclusiveness making. The input and ideas of all participants are gathered and synthesized to arrive at a final decision acceptable to all. Through consensus, the company is not only on the job(p) to achieve better solutions, but also to promote the growth of community and trust.Consensus takes more time, as many resources are investigated before a decision is made. squad members become committed to the decision through consensus. The consensus method lapses everyone experience with new processes of interaction and conflict resolution. For consensus to be a positive experience, the group should have 1) vernacular values, 2) some skill in group process and conflict resolution, or a commitment to let these be facilitated,3) commitment and responsibility to the group by its members, and 4) sufficient time for everyone to participate in the process (C.D.T. 2009). The goal of Envicor is to expand our product line to as many customers as possible. After making signature with a catalog company, a meeting is calledin order to discuss the pros and cons of including our product in the catalog. In the meetings, each person gets a chance to spend his or her opinion. Once everyone has spoken, a decision is made. By using the consensus method, the group is able to come together and make a decision based on each persons opinion.Advantages and disadvantages exist when using the consensus method of decision making.. Some examples areStrengthsEncourages cooperation instead of competitionGarners trust and confidence everyone is involved in the final decisionEveryone agrees to the final decision no matter whether a majority, minority, or lone voiceWeaknessesLack of experience may lead to inefficient use of the methodLack of control in meetings, conversation goes off topicNo ownership when decision is not correct or no consensus made (Notes on Consensus-De cision Making).Consensus seems to work well for smaller companies because it allows them to actually talk out their decisions and come together. Bigger companies might struggle with this type of decision making process because there might be too many employees and it could waste a lot of time.BrainstormingIn the brainstorming model, all employees use free opinion to create ideas that will later be used as part of the projects process. Brainstorming is useful because it allows all employees, some with extensive experience, to give their input. All members contributions allow them to own their role within the group and therefore, believe they have been a larger part of greater good.Like other decision making processes, brainstorming has advantages and disadvantages. One advantage is that all decisions are reached by consensus of the entire group. The larger the group is in a brainstorming session, the better the results will be. Everyone works from his or her strengths, weaknesses, e xperience, and education to find the best results for the project.Next, by making the decision a group project, everyone has a chance toparticipate in the decision making process. They are able to voice their objections and give alternative suggestions. This gift forum allows ideas to flow freely, and sound decisions are made quickly.A disadvantage of brainstorming is similar to one of its advantages. With more than two or three employees making a decision, the result screwing become a point of contention and a fight for power within the group. The more people involved in the process, the greater the propensity for debate, creating the possibility of a stalemate.Another disadvantage of brainstorming is something called group think. This occurs when one member of a group makes a statement, and the others follow along. Nothing is accomplished because only one person is making the decision with no jump-start suggestions. An open dialogue does not exist therefore, solutions to proble ms are not properly explored.SystematicThe systematic approach to decision-making is rational and analytical. (Concise Handbook of Management) This approach employs existing data, and the goal of the decision is the focus of the steps taken to put the decision together. This authors organization uses the systematic approach for making most decisions. A strength of using the systematic approach is that information used to reach the final decision is based on factual data. The goal has been clearly identified the objective(s) have been specify the impact of not addressing the leave has been established. A weakness of systematic decision making, an example of which will be described in the following paragraphs, is that the decision batch become stalled in the process. Additionally, regardless of how much research is done, if all principal stakeholders are not engaged in the process, a negative outcome is possible.Several years ago this authors company developed a product that was de signed to align with current imaging procedures. The equipment is a dual-head injector for use in CT scan. The purpose of the dual-head is to provide Radiologists with the capability of using not only contrast media for the CT exams, but also saline. Benefits of having the saline option developed asthe clinical team became more familiar with the system, but initially the service team was concerned about damage occurring to the injector head if a saline spray was not used.At that time, without consulting other stakeholders, the service and engineering teams went to work on a solution that would prevent this issue.Several years later, as the clinical team was successfully promoting saline usage, the engineering department began shipping a cap for the saline side of the injector. Yes, the issue had been clearly identified, the objective for the project was defined, and the impact of not addressing the issue had been determined. However, because all stakeholders in the decision were no t involved, and because the process took so long, the decision and resulting action became a very expensive mistake.DemocraticIn this participative form of the decision making process the superior(s) gives complete ownership of the decision to the subordinates (Sager 1999). The democratic decision making process allows for the employees (stakeholders) to have ownership of the decisions that are made. The majority vote wins, which can lead to fast and effective decisions concerning the stakeholders. In this decision making process the adage regarding having strength in numbers reigns true.A drawback to the democratic process can be that no one person takes responsibility for the decision if something goes wrong. It may be hard to pinpoint how the decision came to such a conclusion if it does not work out for the benefit for the stakeholders. In using the example of the Health Insurance Accountability and Portability Act (HIPPA) of 1996, a vote for change by a group of individuals aff ected by the way health records were handled was applauded, then when implement, the act became more a hindrance than a solution to a problem.In the considerable health systems used there was a need to implement a privacy feature to protect patients information, so the HIPPA regulations were signed into law in 1996. HIPPA was implemented by a democratic decision making process and became popular with health organizations such as Medicare and well known health insurance companies. subsequent HIPPAs biggest fans became its biggest objectors because the law made it impossible for anyone to gethealth information on the patient, including the parent(s) or guardians of minor children and the elderly, unless there was a form signed by the patient, the legal guardian, or POA. HIPPA soon became more frustrating than helpful, and the majority who voted for its implementation became the majority opposing it. So in implementing the democratic decision making process for the good of the peopl e to whom the power is given, it must be made known that with great power comes great responsibility (Uncle Ben, Spider Man Pt1).Contrast and ComparisonProblems and issues are generally inevitable when people are working together. Each individual decision making process can allow for better management of those situations for make a better organization. This does not mean there will be an absence of issues, but whether or not the team resolves the problem effectively. Each decision making process described above demonstrates to the reader the importance of adhering to a process that will work for each organization. The consensus method shows how the power of agreement can lead to a good decision. However, this method can be time consuming and teamwork plays a major role.Brainstorming will allow for creativity and open ideas, but can also cause conflicts and debates among the group members due to so many independent ideas being presented. In the systematic approach to decision making organization is critical. This process bases decisions on factual information. The systematic process can be costly if all members are not involved in the final decision. Democratic decisions are made based on majority input. The stakeholders are in total control of the decision making process. Speedy and effective decisions can be made however, problems can occur because not everyone who can vote will vote. Then if a decision has a negative impact on the group it can be hard to identify the owner of the problem.The authors of this paper have investigated four types of decision making, consensus, brainstorming, systematic, and democratic. Advantages and disadvantages of each type have been presented, and finally, all were compared and contrasted with each other.ReferencesConsensus Decision Making. Aids Coalition to Unleash Power. Retrieved May 19, 2009. http//www.actupny.org/documents/CDdocuments/Consensus.htmlNotes on Consensus-Decision Making. Retrieved May 19, 2009. www.vernalpr oject.org/papers/process/ConsensNotes.pdfScott, Jonathan T. 2009, Concise Handbook of Management A Practitioners ApproachChapter 17 Managerial Decision Making and Problem Solving, p131- 138retrieved 5/19/09 from http//web.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.apollolibrary.com/ehost/pdf?vid=9&hid=106&sid=f7f74d3b-190b-4f87-ae2e-438809c65b35%40sessionmgr109McConnell, C. R. (2006). Umikers Management Skills for the New Health Care Supervisor.Ch 25 pp.337-345.Sager, K.L., & Gastil, J.,(1999). ambit consensus on consensus Communication Quarterly. 47(1), 67-79.